MAXTOR ATLAS 10K DRIVER

For our performance tests, we’re going to take advantage of the specification’s backwards compatibility and run the drive in Ultra mode off of our current host adapter. Finally, Maxtor would deliver a drive that excelled in desktop performance while trailing Fujitsu’s disk in multi-user performance. Seek noises are clearly audible, as one would expect from a SCSI drive that features blazing seek times. Unlike typical productivity applications, high-end audio- and video- editing programs are run in a more serial and less multitasked manner. Maxtor Atlas 10k IV Capacities. Conversely, a high score does not necessarily indicate that the drive exhibits an intrusive noise envelope. A multiple-layer filter sifts through collected data, silently omitting questionable results or results from questionable participants.

Uploader: Kigagrel
Date Added: 6 November 2009
File Size: 10.43 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 38632
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

Keep in mind that the current transfer rate champion, the Cheetah 15K. Finally, Maxtor would deliver a drive that excelled in desktop performance while trailing Fujitsu’s disk in multi-user performance. That said, this specific comparison of 10K RPM drives once again reminds us that altas measurements often do not reveal the whole story when it comes to acoustics.

Our base mmaxtor tests occur with a single unit as the only active device on the host adapter.

Non-localized access and high queue depths differentiate server-style disk access from even the most demanding of workstation loads. Subjectively, however, the Ultrastar is considerably more obtrusive than the 10K V and the Cheetah 10K.

Fujitsu would follow with its offering that would trump Seagate in server performance while not quite measuring up in single-user scenarios. Multi-User Performance StorageReview uses the following tests to assess server performance: A standard five-year warranty backs the drive.

  FS 4200DN DRIVER

The following results serve only as a reference; SR does not factor them into final judgments jaxtor recommends that readers do the same.

Maxtor Atlas 10k IV Ultra 36gb SCSI 10k RPM | eBay

According to filtered and analyzed data collected from participating StorageReview. Samsung ZET Review. Legacy Performance eTesting Lab’s WinBench 99 Disk WinMark tests are benchmarks that attempt to measure desktop performance through a rather dated recording of high-level applications. Legacy Performance eTesting Lab’s WinBench 99 Disk WinMark tests are benchmarks that attempt to measure desktop performance through a rather dated recording of high-level applications.

Maxtor Atlas 10k V 3.5 Series 146gb Serial Attached SCSI Ultra 320

It’s in the SR Gaming DriveMarkof all things, that the Atlas opens up the widest gap between itself and the competition. The lack of high-pitch whine and the subtle nature of the drive’s midrange noise should allow most workstation and desktop users easy integration. In the following tests, the GB Maxtor Atlas 10K V is compared against the following drives for the following reasons: Maxtor positions the Atlas 10K V to service traditional workhorse server applications where capacity and cost constraints rule out high-speed 15, RPM drives.

Legacy Performance Attlas in megabytes per second.

As one of a new breed of SCSI drives, the Atlas 10K V crams gigabytes of data onto a single two-sided platter that measures less than three inches in diameter. The Atlas 10K V weighs in at A five-year warranty protects the drive.

  ASPIRE 8920 XP DRIVER

Maxtor Atlas 10k IV | – Storage Reviews

This test 1k Windows XP’s bootup from the initial bootstrap load all the way to initialization and loading of arlas following memory-resident utilities: Note that the percentages in bold above may change as more information continues to be collected and analyzed. Maxtor Atlas 10K V Capacities. AAF purportedly improves signal strength and integrity over traditional pre-compensation methods to further increase performance, decrease data error rates, and improve device compatibility and interoperability.

Let’s turn to some high-level tests to see how these impressive low-level translate into application performance.

Maxtor Atlas 10k IV

Multi-User Atlae StorageReview uses the following tests to assess server performance: Maxtor Atlas 10k IV Capacities. Bear maxtr mind that improved bandwidth is only one of the benefits that Ultra delivers. Maxtor, Fujitsu, and Seagate eventually followed with their launches.

Scores on top are better. The following results serve only as a reference; SR does not factor them into final judgments and recommends that readers do the same. A multiple-layer filter sifts through collected data, silently omitting questionable results or results from questionable participants.

Unlike typical productivity applications, high-end audio- and video- editing programs are run in a more serial and less multitasked manner. For more information, please click here.